Victims’ families oppose senators’ bid to alter Sept. 11 law

The office building at 200 Liberty Street, center, is reflected in one of two pools at the September 11 Memorial in New York on Wednesday, Aug. 26, 2015. The Associated Press plans to move its global headquarters from Manhattan's far west side to 200 Liberty St. in 2017, the news cooperative's President Gary Pruitt announced Wednesday. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)
The office building at 200 Liberty Street, center, is reflected in one of two pools at the September 11 Memorial in New York on Wednesday, Aug. 26, 2015. The Associated Press plans to move its global headquarters from Manhattan's far west side to 200 Liberty St. in 2017, the news cooperative's President Gary Pruitt announced Wednesday. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

WASHINGTON (AP) — The families of Sept. 11 victims are voicing their stern opposition to a proposed change to a new law that allows them to sue Saudi Arabia for its alleged backing of the attackers, invoking the support of President-elect Donald Trump for their cause.

In a statement late Wednesday, they said the adjustment proposed by two Republican senators would “effectively gut” the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act.

But John McCain of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said their amendment is necessary to ensure that lawsuits can only be brought against countries that knowingly engaged in the financing or sponsorship of terrorism.

Congress handed Barack Obama the first veto override of his presidency in late September in overwhelmingly passing the law. Saudi Arabia, an important U.S. ally in the Middle East, fought to prevent the bill, known as JASTA, from being passed. The kingdom has hired a number of high-profile lobbying firms to work on its behalf.

Graham, who described the change as a “caveat” during remarks on the Senate floor, said he fears that without the change other countries could pass laws that hold the United States liable when civilians are killed or injured during a legitimate attack on a terrorist target.

“It protects the United States in its efforts to defend itself in a very dangerous world,” Graham said. “We don’t want to be sued under those circumstances.” That’s essentially the same reason Obama decided to veto the bill.

Terry Strada, national chair of 9/11 Families and Survivors United For Justice Against Terrorism, said Graham and McCain are seeking to “torpedo” the law by making changes demanded by Saudi Arabia’s lobbyists.

“We have reviewed the language, and it is an absolute betrayal,” Strada said. “The president-elect has made his support for JASTA crystal clear, and there is zero risk that he will support this kind of backroom backstabbing of the 9/11 families.”

Trump had called Obama’s veto of JASTA in September “shameful” said it would “go down as one of the low points of his presidency.”

In their statement, the 9/11 families said the senators’ change is far more than a caveat. They are proposing “to add a specific jurisdictional defense Saudi Arabia has been relying on for the last 13 years to avoid having to face the 9/11 families’ evidence on the merits,” according to the statement.

They also said JASTA’s liability provision requires that the foreign state have “knowingly provided substantial assistance” to a designated terrorist organization in order for there to be liability.

Among the lobbying firms retained by Saudi Arabia is Squire Patton Boggs, which has a $100,000-a-month deal with the kingdom, according to registration documents filed with the U.S. Justice Department. Former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott and former Louisiana Sen. John Breaux are on the firm’s team, which is providing the Saudi Royal Court with “legal and strategic policy advice and advocacy.”

The Saudis haven’t limited their lobbying to Congress, the records show. The Embassy of Saudi Arabia hired Qorvis MSL Group and Flywheel Government Solutions last month to educate governors and lieutenant governors “on the impacts and potential risks/threats that JASTA poses on their states’ business and economic interests, members of the military and national security,” according to the agreement.

Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the Senate’s No. 2 Republican and one of the main sponsors of JASTA, said Wednesday that he doubted there’s time to change a bill that had so much support from Democrats and Republicans. Congress is scheduled to adjourn next week.

“Once Congress overwhelmingly overrides a president’s veto, to me the opponents have a pretty steep hill to climb,” Cornyn said.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s